Mattsapundit

As David Benzion is discussing right now, Steve Emerson of the Counterterrorism Blog doubts the sincerity of the CAIR-endorsed “fatwa” which supposedly condemns terrorism. It turns out the “fatwa’s” issuers have significant ties to global Islamic terrorism.

Emerson writes:

This morning a group of American Islamic leaders held a press conference to announce a fatwa, or Islamic religious ruling, against “terrorism and extremism.” An organization called the Fiqh Council of North America (FCNA) issued the fatwa, and the Council on American – Islamic Relations (CAIR) organized the press conference, stating that several major U.S. Muslim groups endorsed the fatwa.In fact, the fatwa is bogus. Nowhere does it condemn the Islamic extremism ideology that has spawned Islamic terrorism. It does not renounce nor even acknowledge the existence of an Islamic jihadist culture that has permeated mosques and young Muslims around the world. It does not renounce Jihad let alone admit that it has been used to justify Islamic terrorist acts. It does not condemn by name any Islamic group or leader. In short, it is a fake fatwa designed merely to deceive the American public into believing that these groups are moderate. In fact, officials of both organizations have been directly linked to and associated with Islamic terrorist groups and Islamic extremist organizations. One of them is an unindicted co-conspirator in a current terrorist case; another previous member was a financier to Al-Qaeda.

Read it all.

Matt Bramanti | July 29, 2005 at 5:32 pm
Posted to International, Islamofascism, National, Uncategorized

No comments yet

HCAD is squirming:

Harris County property owners who protest their tax appraisals routinely lose because they face illegal obstacles, a lawsuit filed by a Houston firm that helps people challenge their appraisals contends.

The lawsuit, filed Monday by O’Connor & Associates, alleges that Harris County’s appraisal review board, which weighs protests, does not act independently of the Harris County Appraisal District, which appraises property.

Jim Robinson, Harris County’s chief appraiser, said the lawsuit is without merit and that review panels reduce appraised values in 70 percent to 80 percent of cases brought before them.

The plaintiff argues that the appraisal district has inappropriate influence over the process of challenging appraisals, including controlling the scheduling of hearings, and fails to provide advance copies of its evidence, as required by law.

“Some (appraisal review board) panels ignore the property owner’s evidence of unequal appraisal even under circumstances where the district presents no evidence at all,” the lawsuit says.

O’Connor & Associates is seeking a temporary restraining order to prevent protest hearings until it ensures the protection of property owners’ rights.

Full disclosure: While in college, I worked at O’Connor for three summers. (I don’t work there now.) I represented property owners in about 2,500 hearings, and I can attest that the ARB’s actions raise serious doubts about its independence.

The law requires the appraisal district to make all its evidence available to the property owner 14 days before the hearing. Lately, the district has been introducing new evidence — heretofore unseen by the property owner — during the hearings, with no objections by the ARB.

In most cases, ARB members are fair and reasonably impartial. But in many cases, the body effectively serves as an extension of the appraisal district, and that’s just wrong.

Pat O’Connor is a tenacious, smart guy who knows pretty much everything there is to know about tax appraisals. I get the feeling HCAD is running scared on this one.

Matt Bramanti | July 29, 2005 at 2:00 pm
Posted to Uncategorized

1 comment

Helen Thomas is threatening suicide:

Veteran wire reporter Helen Thomas is vowing to ‘kill herself’ if Dick Cheney announces he is running for president.

The newspaper HILL first reported the startling claim on Thursday.

“The day Dick Cheney is going to run for president, I’ll kill myself,” she told the HILL. “All we need is one more liar.”

In a completely unrelated story, I sent some jack to the RNC with the specific request that it be applied to the veep’s presidential campaign.

I’m hoping she does the deed in some spectacular way. Any hack can chase a fistful of Valium with a fifth of vodka. Helen can do better. I’m hoping for something beginning with a hail of gunfire and ending with a fiery plunge into the icy Potomac.

Matt Bramanti | July 29, 2005 at 1:36 am
Posted to Uncategorized

2 comments

Whoops:

A man chasing down a pair of suspected robbers says his situation went from bad to worse when he dialed 911 for help.

TJ Huntley says he watched as two men broke into his car and stole his wallet and laptop computer. It happened while he was jogging at Clear Brook City Park. His cell phone records show he called for help, not once but four times in five minutes. And, he was transferred to a Harris County line every time.

“The last thing I expected was having to argue with dispatch on sending an officer out to catch two bad guys who just broke into my car,” Huntley said.

Not only that, he claims the county dispatcher hung up on him twice. Huntley chased the suspects as long as he could, for about 15 minutes. The two suspects got away.

This is better than any ad the NRA could dream up.

Matt Bramanti | July 27, 2005 at 11:41 am
Posted to Uncategorized

No comments yet

The Chronicle is ostensibly a newspaper, right? One would think its editors would follow the news.

One would be horribly wrong:

The thunder and fire of what appeared to be a nearly flawless launch Tuesday from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida served notice that NASA’s commitment to station Americans permanently in space and eventually to take them well beyond Earth’s orbit is back at full throttle and soaring upward.

Appeared nearly flawless to whom? Every news outlet in the English-speaking world is discussing the damage to the orbiter in today’s launch. A piece of foam insulation sloughed off the external fuel tank (fortunately missing the orbiter), and another piece of debris struck — and damaged — the Shuttle’s critical heat shield.

Here’s a smattering of headlines.

Drudge:

HOW SERIOUS?

AP:

NASA Probes Shuttle Debris After Launch

Reuters:

NASA sends shuttle to space, debris fears arise

Considering that seven astronauts were incinerated the last time this scenario happened, how the hell can someone consider the launch “nearly flawless?”

Also, this paragraph struck me as a complete non sequitur:

Fittingly, the first woman to command a shuttle mission, 48-year-old retired Air Force Col. Eileen Collins, is directing her second flight aboard the retooled Discovery.

How is that fitting? Once we’ve established that a woman can command a shuttle — and Col. Collins established that — why make a gender issue out of it?

Matt Bramanti | July 27, 2005 at 2:05 am
Posted to Uncategorized

No comments yet

Heh:

The following is a statement of James P. Hoffa on the Teamsters disaffiliation from the AFL-CIO:

Good afternoon. This is an historic day. I join my brother Andy Stern and the great SEIU in a joint announcement.

I am here today to announce that the General Executive Board of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters has unanimously voted to withdraw our membership from the AFL-CIO.

That muffled sound you hear is Jimmy Hoffa spinning in his grave end zone.

For the record, the International Brotherhood of Bloggers, Local 713 — of which I am the president, sergeant-at-arms and sole member — wholeheartedly supports the dissolution of the AFL-CIO.

Every now and then I’ll see a bumper sticker that says “Unions: The People Who Brought You Weekends.” I’m never quite sure if that’s a pro-union or anti-union message. It just as easily could’ve been “Unions: The People Who Slashed Productivity by 28.6%.” Just a thought.

Matt Bramanti | July 25, 2005 at 4:04 pm
Posted to Uncategorized

No comments yet

What in the hell is the purpose of printing this story now?

IT hasn’t been the best of summers for Rick Brass, a former captain in the Harris County Precinct 4 Constable’s Office.

Brass, 56, also a lawyer, recently found himself on the wrong side of the law after a fender bender at the constable station on Cypresswood. The incident led to his resignation and a misdemeanor charge.

Brass says he was at the station on June 28 when he was upset by a call from his soon-to-be ex-wife, asking him to haul a trailer home so she could move out.

He installed a trailer hitch on his personal vehicle, but as he backed out, he heard a noise and slammed on the brakes. He got out and found a Honda roadster behind him. Brass said he wasn’t sure he had struck it, however, so he drove away.

Brass resigned on July 6 and was charged the next day with failure to stop and give information, a Class B misdemeanor.

The story is mildly amusing, but its only marginally newsworthy, and that if it’s brand new. The wreck happened nearly a month ago. The resignation and charge were nearly three weeks ago.

What is this doing in my newspaper?

Matt Bramanti | July 25, 2005 at 5:00 am
Posted to Uncategorized

No comments yet

Your tax dollars at work.

This, apparently, is a Metro “solution:”

Two Metropolitan Transit Authority buses collided downtown this morning, sending four people to the hospital.

An articulated bus traveling south on Smith apparently ran a red light and slammed into a bus headed east on Dallas about 8:30 a.m., said Ken Connaughton, Metro spokesman.

I have a few questions about the crash, answers to which aren’t even hinted at in the Chron story:

• Was either driver cited for a violation?
• Will either driver be disciplined by Metro?
• Is there a Metro policy for incidents like this?
• Was there any damage to the hotel, or does Metro only damage buildings by using stray current?

Now I have a few questions about the story itself:

• Why didn’t the Chronicle ask any of the above questions? (Hint: Because press releases don’t answer questions.)
• Why isn’t there a byline? (Hint: Because the story is a rehashed press release.)
• Why is the hotel incorrectly identified as the “Hyatt Hotel” when it is actually called the “Hyatt Regency Houston?” (Hint: Because Metro identified it that way in its press release.)
• Why is the hospital incorrectly identified as “St. Joseph’s Hospital” instead of “Christus St. Joseph Hospital?” (Hint: see above.)
• Why does the photo’s cutline list the time of the crash as “around 8:40 a.m.” when the story has the time at “about 8:30 a.m.?”

The story was posted 16 hours after the crash, yet it contains barely more information than the photograph (which wasn’t even taken by a Chron staffer). Come on, guys, y’all can do better than this.

UPDATE: Kudos to the Chron’s Todd Ackerman, who knows how to write the hospital’s name as well as a good story about the facility’s questionable prospects.

Matt Bramanti | July 25, 2005 at 4:13 am
Posted to Uncategorized

No comments yet

Today, the Chron runs a decent editorial applauding Ariel Sharon’s plan to withdraw Jewish settlers from Gaza. It’s fairly unremarkable, except for this:

Pulling out is not a final solution. Some Palestinians continue suicide bombings and rocket attacks against Israelis, even as other Palestinians protest the miles of barriers Israel is constructing to protect against attack.

When pondering the future of the Jewish state, the Chronicle’s editors can’t think of a better turn of phrase than “final solution?”

Brilliant wording, guys.

Matt Bramanti | July 25, 2005 at 4:02 am
Posted to Uncategorized

1 comment

Andrew Sullivan has written his gajillionth “look at me, I’m gay and have HIV” piece:

“People are in such denial about how serious HIV is. Unfortunately, the best prevention is seeing people die.” – Michael Weinstein, president of the AIDS Healthcare Foundation.

I’m sorry. It has taken me a long time to say this, but it’s time: I’m sorry.

I’ve even enjoyed sex more since I became positive — more depth, more intimacy, more appreciation of life itself. Sorry.

Hey, who cares if he’s knowingly exposing others to certain death? At least there’s “more intimacy.”

I look physically and mentally healthier than ever.

Someone can look mentally healthier? Okay…

I know that by just going daily to the gym, walking on the beach, or dancing at the occasional circuit party, I am the cause of more people getting infected with HIV.

It’s not so much the walks on the beach that spread HIV, Andrew. It’s more the continued ass-banging. And what “circuit party?” My guess is it’s the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

In the future I’ll try to look sicker. Or I’ll stay home more. Promise. I’ll try to get depressed. I won’t work out. I’ll stay off TV.

Ooh, promise?

Matt Bramanti | July 24, 2005 at 1:16 am
Posted to Uncategorized

No comments yet

Greetings, valued and loyal readers! I’m glad both of you could make it. Mattsapundit will be undergoing some significant changes over the next few weeks. New blog software (WordPress, with all sorts of cool tweaks), a professionally-created new design, and much more content will be coming soon, hopefully in the next couple of weeks. However, there’s one piece missing.

A new name.

So I’m asking for your help. I have a few criteria:

1. It should be short (two words, maybe?) and easy to remember. I’m not as young as I used to be, and neither are you.
2. It should have an available .com domain.
3. It should have some sort of meaning or story behind it. I don’t want something generic like “Matt’s Abuse of the First Amendment” or “Rants from a Filthy Hovel in H-Town.”

That’s y’all’s homework assignment. I’ve been thinking for a few days now, and I’m just stuck. Email me with your suggestions. If I use yours, I’ll buy you a steak dinner.

A real steak dinner, not a Night Hawk. (Sorry Rob.)

UPDATE, 1:43 a.m.: Travis over at Voice in the Wilderness offered several suggestions for a name. This one in particular struck my fancy:

RhetoricalHumidity.com (like the humidity in Houston,
your posts tend to stick with people for a while)

I really like that one. In addition, my thoughts tend to make people sweat and curse. That’s a good one.

Keep ‘em coming, folks!

Matt Bramanti | July 23, 2005 at 9:29 pm
Posted to Uncategorized

No comments yet

Rob Booth and I rolled into the Arms last night for a few adult beverages. Booth had Boddingtons, which he graciously reviewed:

The ale was good. It tasted like beer, but with a kick. I liked it.

I had Strongbow, an excellent British dry cider. Here’s my foray into pretentious ciderblogging:

The cider was good. It tasted like apple juice, but with a kick. I liked it.

Damn, I’m good.

Matt Bramanti | July 22, 2005 at 3:05 pm
Posted to Food & Drink, Friends, Out and About, Reviews

1 comment

I was curious where the phrase “read the Riot Act” comes from, so I consulted good ol’ Wikipedia:

The Riot Act (1 Geo. 1, c. 5), long title “An act for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies, and for the more speedy and effectual punishing the rioters”, is an old piece of English legislation allowing certain officials to declare any assembly of more than twelve persons to be unlawful and order the assembly to disperse within one hour on pain of death. Most sources say it was enacted in 1715, but it was actually enacted in 1714 and went into effect in 1715. This was a period of insurgency in England.

To invoke the Act, the following words had to be read by a “justice or justices of the peace, or by the sheriff of the county, or his under-sheriff, or by the mayor, bailiff or bailiffs, or other head-officer, or justice of the peace of any city or town corporate”:

“Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.”

In Canada, the version goes as follows:

“Her Majesty the Queen charges and commands all persons being assembled immediately to disperse and peaceably to depart to their habitations or their lawful business, on pain of being guilty of an offence for which, on conviction, they may be sentenced to an imprisonment for life. GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!”

The Riot Act has to be read verbatim, and at least one conviction has been overturned in a case where the words “God Save the King” had been omitted.

It’s kind of a shame that the term has been watered down to mean just a harsh tongue-lashing, when the real meaning is “get the hell out of here RIGHT NOW or you will HANG.”

By the way, here’s the whole Riot Act. This is how it works.

If 12 or more people are rioting, a peace officer goes to the crowd and reads the Riot Act. The rioters have exactly 60 minutes after “God Save the King!” to get the hell out of Dodge. If they don’t, and there are still at least 12 of them, Johnny Law rounds them all up. And if any of the rioters should accidentally be shot, stomped on by Johnny Law’s horse or beaten to a bloody pulp, Johnny Law is off the hook. The surviving rioters are dragged off to a judge, where they are sentenced to death.

Other provisions of the Riot Act:

-Any rioter trying to demolish a church or “any dwelling-house, barn, stable, or other out-house” is sentenced to death.

-Any armed person who forceably hinders or attempts to hinder a peace officer from reading the Riot Act is sentenced to death. In such a case, the rioters still have an hour to disperse or be sentenced to death, if they knew about the hindrance.

-Anyone whose church, house, barn, stable or other out-house is destroyed by rioters can sue, and the town is on the hook for the damage.

Interestingly, the Act applies to groups of 12 or more. If I’m interpreting this right, if 12 rioters are rioting, and the sheriff comes by and reads the Riot Act, and one of them goes home, the other 11 guys can just keep on rioting.

So, the next time you feel like starting a riot in 18th-century England, remember to establish a 12-man team with one Designated Weenie.

Matt Bramanti | July 20, 2005 at 9:11 pm
Posted to Uncategorized

No comments yet

Rob Booth points out that a veterans’ group has come out against the proposed constitutional amendment to prohibit desecration of the American Flag:

Veterans Defending the Bill of Rights, a network of thousands of U.S. military veterans committed to preserving freedom, today expressed its disappointment with the House passage of a constitutional amendment to ban the “physical desecration” of the flag. If passed by the Senate and ratified by the states, the proposal would be the first restriction to the Bill of Rights to be included in the Constitution.

Rob’s comments are short and sweet:

This is an ACLU front group.I signed up.

They’re right.

They are right, and here’s why. I abhor flag-burning. I salute that flag, I pledge my allegiance to that flag, and when I’m standing on a chunk of land with that flag over it, I’m pretty sure I’ll be okay. When I see an American flag burning in some demonstration on TV, it really pisses me off. I’ve never seen one burning in person, but if I ever do, I’m reasonably certain I would beat the hell out of the guy with the lighter. The constitution might protect that hippie from the government — and rightly so — but the First Amendment says “Congress shall make no law,” not “Matt shall kick no ass.”

Which is exactly the point of the Bill of Rights. It is not a handbook for how government should rule its subjects, and it’s not a guide on how to be a nice, quiet lamb. On the contrary, it’s all about restraining government and encouraging rabble-rousers.

It’s important to remember who the founding fathers were. They were not a bunch of lily-livered civil libertarians in the modern sense. They weren’t upset because porn wasn’t readily available in libraries or because kids prayed in schools. They were upset because they were being ruled from thousands of miles away by an inbred tyrant who taxed them without any input, who refused to allow free movement of the people, and who even made his subjects house and feed his troops.

So they got pissed, grabbed their muskets, and set out to kill the government. These guys didn’t screw around. And once they got done killing the government, they sat down to start over and get it right this time. So they wrote the constitution, which is revolutionary in many ways.

It is revolutionary in that it changed the paradigm of the government-citizen relationship: no longer is the government the master and the citizen the servant. It is revolutionary in that it was created after a revolutionary war by government-killing revolutionary warriors. And it’s revolutionary in that it even provides for its own overthrow by revolution. The whole point of the Second Amendment is to prevent tyranny by ensuring the existence of an armed citizenry, ready to kill the government if circumstances warrant.

The Bill of Rights severely limits the powers of government so that the people — collectively and individually — are protected from those powers. It doesn’t say what we can do. It says what the government can’t do:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion…

…the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed

No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue…

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime…nor shall any person be subject…nor shall be compelled…nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property…nor shall private property be taken

…no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined…

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

That’s a lot of nos, nots and neithers. You can almost imagine King George III discussing civil liberties with George Mason:

George the Third, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of His other Realms and Territories King, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith: “Can I hold prisoners indefinitely?”
George Mason: “No.”
G3: “Okay, what about summary executions?”
Mason: “What, are you kidding? No!”
G3: “Well, can I…”
Mason: “NO!” [BANG!]

Even in the few situations where the constitution discusses what you and I can’t do, it puts very tough restrictions on the government’s ability to nail us for it. We’re not supposed to commit treason, but even if we do, we can’t get convicted unless the feds have an overwhelming, ironclad, bulletproof case. Why? Because the founders were a bunch of treasonous government-killers, and they knew that every now and then, that’s just the kind of guy you need.

They also believed in certain restrictions on free speech, as I do. Those restrictions should rightly be imposed by reasonable social mores, not by government.

Why doesn’t everyone abuse free speech all the time? Why don’t we walk around naked, scream “Fire!” in crowded movie theaters, or stand on a street corner and yell cuss words at the top of our lungs? It’s not because we’re fearful of prosecution. It’s because we understand that civilized people just don’t do that sort of thing. Natural respect for each other and for society limits these extreme events, without the heavy hand of government.

Matt Bramanti | July 20, 2005 at 8:19 pm
Posted to National, Uncategorized

No comments yet

Kudos to LST taskmaster David Benzion for pointing this out:

[Source: FOX News, 5/1/03]

In the beginning of Wednesday’s Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing for Bush nominee John G. Roberts Jr., Chairman Orrin Hatch praised Democrat Sen. Charles Schumer of New York for asking “intelligent” questions, but then Hatch switched gears.

“Some [of Schumer’s questions] I totally disagree with,” Hatch of Utah said. “Some I think are dumbass questions, between you and me. I am not kidding you. I mean, as much as I love and respect you [Schumer], I just think that’s true.”

A stunned Schumer asked if he heard the chairman correctly, to which Hatch said yes. Again, Schumer asked Hatch if he would like to “revise and extend his remark,” congressional speak for change his mind.

A former trial attorney, Hatch replied: “No, I am going to keep it exactly the way it is. I mean, I hate to say it. I mean, I feel badly saying it between you and me. But I do know dumbass questions when I see dumbass questions.”

That’s pretty cool. Add John McCain’s role in a Vince Vaughn movie, and I have a renewed respect for Senate Republicans.

Next up, Rick Santorum grabs Mary Landrieu’s ass, Chuck Hagel sucker-punches Arlen Specter, and the boys steal Ted Kennedy’s car and joyride to Atlantic City for a three-day bender.

Matt Bramanti | July 20, 2005 at 12:26 am
Posted to Uncategorized

1 comment

Laurence Simon is a really nice guy.

As part of his “Give Your Money to Anyone But Andrew Sullivan Project,” your humble correspondent has been designated a Worthy Recipientâ„¢ of seven United States Dollars.

Here’s how the project works:

1. When Andrew Sullivan begs for money, don’t give him any.
2. Give money to a blogger other than Andrew Sullivan.
3. Post on your weblog that you’re not giving money to Andrew Sullivan and that you’re giving to some other blogger.
4. OPTIONAL: Write Andrew Sullivan and tell him you’re thought about it and given your money to someone other than him.

Sincere thanks go out to Laurence for his generous donation to the Matthew F. Bramanti Stuff Acquisition fund. I think I’ll pay it forward to Rob as a directed donation — to be used for Night Hawk dinners and wine only.

Matt Bramanti | July 19, 2005 at 4:14 pm
Posted to Uncategorized

No comments yet

…when a story told over a round of beers includes the following line:

So I ended up sucking face with the associate director of NORML.

Heh.

Matt Bramanti | July 18, 2005 at 10:11 am
Posted to Friends, Out and About

No comments yet

I’m constantly amazed at the cool stuff geeks come up with:

This one may be a little nutty, but you have to admit nobody knew PCs could do it. In fact, I’m still not sure they can. This clever but crazy hack runs a virtual needle around a scanned image of an LP to create a .wav file of the recorded music. You won’t want to rip your old LPs this way, though. Programmer Ofer Springer’s demonstration file, a reconstructed recording of Vivaldi’s “The Four Seasons,” sounds like it’s being played at your neighbor’s house–across the street. Still, it’s good enough that you can recognize bits of the melody. See this Web site for more, or download and compile the Digital Needle source code, fire up your scanner, and try it yourself.

How do it know?

Matt Bramanti | July 17, 2005 at 2:36 pm
Posted to Uncategorized

No comments yet

Some folks are portraying Valerie Plame as some kind of super spy, ruthlessly outed by the nefarious Karl Rove (who probably heads up S.P.E.C.T.R.E. and K.A.O.S. on the weekends). The fact is, Plame didn’t even take the most basic steps to protect her own identity:

Meeting in Paris, London, and Brussels, they got very serious very quickly. On the third or fourth date, he says, they were in the middle of a “heavy make-out” session when she said she had something to tell him. She was very conflicted and very nervous, thinking of everything that had gone into getting her to that point, such as money and training.

She was, she explained, undercover in the C.I.A.

A handful of dates, and she spills the beans. Attention, foreign spies: want to seduce and recruit a U.S. intelligence agent? Forget the bribes, diamonds, threats and torture. Just whisper sweet nothings and you can turn a CIA desk jockey in under two weeks.

Matt Bramanti | July 14, 2005 at 2:15 pm
Posted to Uncategorized

No comments yet

From today’s Chronicle:

When The Methodist Hospital went looking for a new chief of surgery, it wanted someone primed to tackle a rare challenge: rebuilding a program out of the ashes of last year’s split with Baylor College of Medicine.

What it got was even more rare: a woman.

Who knew women were rare? I’d better go stock up.

Matt Bramanti | July 14, 2005 at 1:27 pm
Posted to Uncategorized

No comments yet